0

Knotrope

K.

    What's wrong with the new "Jurassic World 3"

    "Jurassic" has been updated again. This weekend in mid-June, "Jurassic World 3" was released simultaneously in China and North America, giving a timely adrenaline rush to the extremely sluggish mainland movie market. At the same time as "up" and "heartbeat", most fans still feel empty and suspended, which is incomparable with the previous two, not to mention the classic "Jurassic Park", the originator of "Jurassic Universe", Douban 6.4 VS 8.2, it is evident.
    Although many people can't get rid of the psychological curse of "the worse the worse, the better they look", and they also need to find a gap for escape and indulgence under the lingering epidemic, but "the eyes of the masses are sharp", a film that does not care too much Making, blindly "gnawing on old nostalgia" is ultimately more regret than reminiscence. So what are the stalks of the new "Jurassic World 3" that have been broken?
    gene editing. This biological cutting-edge concept is already a Hollywood standard module operation, and it is very knowledgeable to use it well and badly. In "Jurassic Park", Dr. Strange creatively used the blood of ancient mosquitoes trapped in amber to extract the DNA of dinosaurs, and used this information to breed and breed dinosaurs; and the core of the whole "Jurassic World 3" It is "studying dinosaur genes will benefit mankind". The mastermind behind the manipulation of dinosaur genes, Biosyn, extracted dinosaur genes and used them on "giant locusts", allowing them to devour all food crops, but did not start with Biosyn's genetically modified crops in order to achieve the attempt to control the food chain.
    Not to mention how stupid this operation is, completely exposing the motives and effects to the news investigation; the dinosaur gene + locust body only makes the locust "big and useless" on the screen, but it does not feel sinister, and in the end it is still a dinosaur's mouth. worm. The key to solving this crisis is to clone the girl Maisie. She is the masterpiece of her mother, Dr. Lockwood. She is perfectly cloned, and her inherited gene defects are eliminated. But the film's "out of place" location so far evades how to make it happen. "Jurassic World 3" is still in the initial stage of genetic technology, editing for editing, and the stalk of clones is also low-level repetition.
    Nostalgic Cassette. Everyone will remember the close-up of the "jaw drop" when the two great doctors were invited to "Jurassic Park", and the next scene is engraved with film history, with the huge brontosaurus fiddling with its neck. Yes, the movie helped humans realize the "dinosaur dream" for the first time. This time, "Jurassic World 3" has almost all the previous characters. The two great doctors reunited after 20 years. The golden thread turned white, the young man became an old man, and the doctor of chaos, the former "Jurassic" in the Director Claire, and "How to Train Your Dragon" Owen. "Jurassic Park" stills

    "Jurassic Park" stills

    "Jurassic Park" stills

    "Jurassic Park" stills

    Sam Neill as Grant in 'Jurassic Park' and 'Jurassic World 3'

    Sam Neill as Grant in 'Jurassic Park' and 'Jurassic World 3'

    The ambition of Jurassic World 3 clearly outweighs the ability. Three-line narrative: 1. The two doctors search for the biological source of the giant locust; 2. Claire and Owen take the cloned girl to retreat; 3. The gene company Byosn fights with the undercover bosses. There are actually eight or nine main characters, and the rhythm of collectively fighting monsters is dazzling and difficult to focus, and the capacity of two and a half hours is not enough for multi-line tossing. Is Hollywood also fashionable "collectivism"? This one-pot nostalgic operation is not wise. The famous film critic Miller commented, "Among all actors, I am afraid that only dinosaurs can play the best".
    Dinosaur Wars. Even if CGI is so realistic and immersive today, the main action of "Jurassic World 3" is still basically following the previous routine. In the 1990s, due to the limitations of special effects and later stages, almost all dinosaur shots were medium and long-range shots, and they could not or dare not "stop and watch" skin, feathers, wrinkles, expressions, etc. for a long time. 2022's Jurassic World 3 is clearly in the running. In the opening Alaska fishing scene, the sea dragon kicked off, with Owen and the galloping Paragonosaurus chasing in the middle, the latter's muscle lines and movement curves did not violate the ice and snow, and the brightly shining feathers of the fire raptor were amazing. . "Jurassic World 3" stills

    "Jurassic World 3" stills

    The CGI is perfect, but the battle between the dinosaurs is still clichéd. The ending is naturally the "Double Beast Fighting" between the Tyrannosaurus Rex and the Southern Giant Beast Dragon, but everyone who has become attached to the dinosaurs has all kinds of coincidences - the Tyrannosaurus Rex overturned the car and happened to turn over to the protagonist's side. Dragons can be successfully encountered in the laboratory. Can't be harsh on Hollywood, but to be honest, Jurassic World 3 didn't create any "reversal points" in its entirety.
    Tribute to the blockbuster. Salutation is an attitude of respect, but abuse is abusive. "Jurassic World 3" arranges the spectacular and exotic Mediterranean Malta "Dinosaur Underground Trading Market", which can copy "007 Sky Killer" in terms of rhythm, plot arrangement, action scenes and the result of escape The motorcycle chase scene in Istanbul. According to foreign reports, following the international counter-terrorism of the "Mission Impossible" series, the "Jurassic World 3" crew traveled to Italy, Canada, and England, and borrowed the 007 studio to capture the feelings of "Top Gun". It's a pity that because the plot is scattered, there are many characters, and the leading role of dinosaurs is too eye-catching, it is more like a big platter in the end. "Jurassic World 3" stills

    "Jurassic World 3" stills

    "The Ringer" magazine sharply commented, "No matter how exquisite and huge the dinosaurs in "Jurassic World 3" are, they are destined to live in the shadow of "Jurassic Park" in 1993". There are even more damaging criticisms that the series should be like the dinosaurs - extinct.
    "Jurassic World 3" itself is not so pessimistic. It not only plays tricks, but also sublimates its high-profile philosophy. The voiceover at the end calls out loudly, "Humans and dinosaurs must trust and depend on each other to build a coexisting world." Even our "community of destiny" has to be learned, and Hollywood's meme has become globalized.

    Comments

    Leave a Reply

    + =